Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor optimization in ignoreElements operator #3181

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2018
Merged

Conversation

fljot
Copy link
Contributor

@fljot fljot commented Dec 12, 2017

Description:
Minor optimization in ignoreElements operator.
We don't need to call any kind of noop function, simply do not call anything.
I mean, sure, it's not a bottleneck by no means, but better without, right?

@rxjs-bot
Copy link

rxjs-bot commented Dec 12, 2017

Messages
📖

CJS: 1383.4KB, global: 752.4KB (gzipped: 120.7KB), min: 145.3KB (gzipped: 31.4KB)

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.0008%) to 97.079% when pulling f40eafb on fljot:patch-1 into efcd922 on ReactiveX:master.

Minor optimization.
We don't need to call any kind of `noop` function, simply do not call anything.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.0008%) to 97.079% when pulling d013820 on fljot:patch-1 into efcd922 on ReactiveX:master.

@kwonoj
Copy link
Member

kwonoj commented Jan 11, 2018

This doesn't harm anything and safe to check in, so.. 🚢

@kwonoj kwonoj merged commit fc4a55a into ReactiveX:master Jan 11, 2018
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jun 6, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 6, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants